"Appointing a man who has publicly attacked the pope and other religious leaders for their support of traditional marriage is deeply offensive to millions of Americans in the faith-based community he is appointed to serve," said Pence in a statement.
The remarks that Pence is referring to seem to relate to his role as a gay-rights activist. He said the Knights of Columbus "were foot soldiers of a discredited army of oppression," referring to the knights' support of a California state amendment that overturned same-sex marriages. He spoke out against the pope's statement that condoms increase the spread of AIDS. Knox also challenged President Obama's decision to have conservative Pastor Rick Warren give the inaugural invocation because of Warren's stance on marriage. This is pretty regular stuff for a gay-rights activist.
What I don't understand is why Pence would call for the removal of a man who was acting in accordance with his beliefs as an activist. As a congressman who applies his beliefs to such political hot-topics as gay marriage and abortion, why would he be so against another person who is doing the same?
On his Web site Pence describes himself as "'a Christian, a conservative and a Republican,' in that order." His voting record shows that since September Pence has voted the party line in all but three cases, according to the Washington Post's voting database. He has only missed 4 percent of over 5,000 votes. It seems to me that the man is a fairly regular party member. This makes me think that perhaps the comments he made regarding Knox have more to do with his stance as a Christian Republican and less to do with what Knox said.
Which makes me wonder, how many Christians--republican or otherwise--say or believe something simply because they are expected to? Easter was this week, and I have never seen parking lots so full at churches. How many of those attending were simply paying up on fire insurance?
There's a movie I love called "Saved." It's a high school drama, but it's set in a private Christian school. The two main characters are former best friends. One gets pregnant, the other gets critical. As the movie progresses, the critical one becomes increasingly harsh, even attempting an exorcism on her pregnant friend. She eventually begins to question herself; not her faith, but her actions. Why was she doing what she was doing?
I feel that this is a question that is not asked often enough in churches. So often there is a large emphasis on the action itself but relatively little emphasis on internal motivation past "because God said so." Perhaps if we Christians knew why we did what we did, we could have a more open dialogue about why others don't. Otherwise, we're doomed to condemn others who don't agree with us. There are enough finger pointers in the world. Let's not get mixed up with them.